, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 217–223 | Cite as

Adult-child interaction in children’s learning from “Sesame Street”

  • Robert A. Reiser
  • Martin A. Tessmer
  • Pamela C. Phelps


This study examined whether children’s learning from “Sesame Street” could be improved by having adults ask the children questions and provide them with feedback while they watched the show. Subjects were 23 three- and four-year-old, white, middle-class children who were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. Children in both conditions watched three specially edited versions of “Sesame Street” with an adult. While they did so, children in the experimental condition were asked to name the letters and numbers shown on the programs. Results indicated that 3 days after watching the last program, children in the experimental condition were better able to name and identify the letters and numbers they had seen (p < .01). Three features of the experimental treatment that may have contributed to these results are discussed, as are the implications of the findings.


Interaction Technique Instructional Television Sesame Street Posttest Performance Filler Segment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alwitt, L. F., Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., & Levin, S. R. (1980). Preschool children’s visual attention to attributes of television.Human Communication Research, 7, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. R., & Levin, S. R. (1976). Young children’s attention to “Sesame Street”.Child Development, 47, 806–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S., & Bogatz, G. A. (1970).The first year of Sesame Street: An Evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 047 823).Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Filep, R. T., Millar, G. R., & Gillette, P. T. (1971).The Sesame mother project. El Segundo, CA: Institute For Educational Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 055 676).Google Scholar
  6. Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction.Review of Educational Research, 47, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lesser, G. S. (1974).Children and television: Lessons from Sesame Street. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  8. Lorch, E. P., Anderson, D. R., & Levin, S. R. (1979). The relationship of visual attention to children’s comprehension of television.Child Development, 50, 722–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Palmer, E. L. (1978, October).A pedagogical analysis of recurrent formats on Sesame Street and The Electric Company. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Educational Broadcasters, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Salomon, G. (1977). Effects of encouraging Israeli mothers to co-observe “Sesame Street” with their five-year olds.Child Development, 48, 1146–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schramm, W. (1972). What the research says. In W. Schramm(Ed.),Quality in instructional television (pp. 44–67). Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  12. Schramm, W. (1977).Big media, little media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Reiser
    • 1
  • Martin A. Tessmer
    • 2
  • Pamela C. Phelps
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational Research, Development, and FoundationsUSA
  2. 2.Florida State UniversityTallahassee

Personalised recommendations